| Regional |
|---|
San Mateo County Board of Education, Area 2One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in San Mateo County Board of Education, Area 2 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Dana Johnson (source for San Mateo County Board of Education, Area 2)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Dana Johnson (source for San Mateo County Board of Education, Area 2)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
San Mateo County Community College Board, Area 2One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in San Mateo County Community College Board, Area 2 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Jason Holt (source for San Mateo County Community College Board, Area 2)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Mike Guingona (source for San Mateo County Community College Board, Area 2)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
South San Francisco Unified School Board, Area COne square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in South San Francisco Unified School Board, Area C | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Chialin Hsieh (source for South San Francisco Unified School Board, Area C)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Chialin Hsieh (source for South San Francisco Unified School Board, Area C)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
South San Francisco Unified School Board, Area EMina Richardson · 1 group One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in South San Francisco Unified School Board, Area E | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Frank Lara (source for South San Francisco Unified School Board, Area E)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Mina Richardson (source for South San Francisco Unified School Board, Area E)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, District 5 (short term)One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, District 5 (short term) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Mark Nagales (source for San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, District 5 (short term))Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | Mark Nagales (source for San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, District 5 (short term))Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
| Regional Transit Measure (RTM) On your ballot: To prevent major service cuts to BART and other transit, avoid increased traffic, and reduce pollution by: Preserving BART, Caltrain, VTA, SamTrans, AC Transit, Muni, other transit for everyone, including workers, students, seniors, persons with disabilities; Supporting transit safety, cleanliness, affordability, reliability; Repairing targeted roads/potholes; Requiring financial transparency, oversight, accountability; shall the measure enacting a 0.5% (Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Santa Clara counties), and 1% (San Francisco) sales tax for 14 years generating approximately $980,000,000 annually, be adopted? 38 groups say Yes. 2 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗– ✓ 38 Yes✗ 2 No– 1 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Regional Transit Measure (RTM) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM))Checked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM))Checked October 8 | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM))Checked October 8 | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM), on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM), on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM))Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM), on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 2 | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM), on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM))Checked October 11 | –No consensus (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM)) | ✓Yes (source for Regional Transit Measure (RTM))Checked October 6 |
|---|
| Measure L – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Extreme Weather Events On your ballot: Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended to add a provision to the Charter Preamble designating long-term resilience to extreme weather events as a County priority? 1 group says Yes. 0 say No. ✓ ✓ 1 Yes✗ 0 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Measure L – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Extreme Weather Events | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Measure L – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Extreme Weather Events)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
| Measure AA – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Affirmation of Rights On your ballot: Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended to add a provision to the Charter Preamble affirming the County’s commitment to the dignity, civil rights, and equal protection of all County residents? 1 group says Yes. 0 say No. ✓ ✓ 1 Yes✗ 0 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Measure AA – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Affirmation of Rights | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Measure AA – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Affirmation of Rights)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
| Measure J – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Time to Call a Special Election or Appoint On your ballot: Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended to extend the period in which the County Board of Supervisors is required to either call a special election or make an appointment in the event of a vacancy in an elected office other than the Board of Supervisors from 30 days to 60 days, and to require the Board to conduct at least one public meeting to receive public comment prior to any appointment? 1 group says Yes. 0 say No. ✓ ✓ 1 Yes✗ 0 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Measure J – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Time to Call a Special Election or Appoint | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Measure J – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Time to Call a Special Election or Appoint)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
| Measure U – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Reapportionment of Supervisorial Districts On your ballot: Shall the San Mateo County Charter be amended to require that supervisorial districts be reapportioned following each federal decennial census by an independent redistricting commission pursuant to applicable provisions of the California Elections Code? 1 group says Yes. 0 say No. ✓ ✓ 1 Yes✗ 0 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Measure U – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Reapportionment of Supervisorial Districts | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Measure U – San Mateo County Charter Amendment – Reapportionment of Supervisorial Districts)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
| Measure M – Jefferson Union High School District Parcel Tax On your ballot: With funds that cannot be taken by the State or Federal Government and spent elsewhere, shall Jefferson Union High School District's measure to directly support teachers and academic programs; expand/enhance career training and college preparedness classes; and hire and retain qualified teachers and counselors at Jefferson High School, Oceana High School, Shasta High School, Terra Nova High School, Thornton High School, and Westmoor High School be adopted, replacing the 2018 parcel tax at $98 per parcel for ten years (raising $3.4 million annually) with full public disclosure of all spending? 1 group says Yes. 0 say No. ✓ ✓ 1 Yes✗ 0 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Measure M – Jefferson Union High School District Parcel Tax | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Measure M – Jefferson Union High School District Parcel Tax)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
| Measure V – San Mateo County Community College District Bond On your ballot: Without increasing current tax rates and to protect affordable higher education at College of San Mateo, Cañada College, and Skyline College by repairing/constructing science, engineering, math, technology, skilled trades, and career-training classrooms that prepare students for in-demand careers; and repairing roofs, plumbing, electrical, shall San Mateo County Community College District’s measure authorizing $848,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately $18 per $100,000 assessed value ($75,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with independent audits, oversight, and all money locally controlled? 1 group says Yes. 0 say No. ✓ ✓ 1 Yes✗ 0 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Measure V – San Mateo County Community College District Bond | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Measure V – San Mateo County Community College District Bond)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
| State |
|---|
| Governor Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) No endorsement · 2 groups Xavier Becerra · 20 groups One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Governor | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor)Checked October 5 | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor)Checked October 2 | –Not listed | Steve Hilton (source for Governor) | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Steve Hilton (source for Governor)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | No endorsement (source for Governor) | –Not listed | Steve Hilton (source for Governor) | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor)Checked October 7 | Steve Hilton (source for Governor)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | No endorsement (source for Governor) | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | –Not listed | Steve Hilton (source for Governor) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | –Not listed | Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Lieutenant Governor Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) No endorsement · 2 groups One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Lieutenant Governor | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor)Checked October 5 | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor)Checked October 2 | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | Gloria Romero (source for Lieutenant Governor) | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Gloria Romero (source for Lieutenant Governor)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | No endorsement (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor)Checked October 7 | Gloria Romero (source for Lieutenant Governor)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | No endorsement (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed | Gloria Romero (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed | Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Secretary of State Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) Shirley Weber · 23 groups One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Secretary of State | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State)Checked October 5 | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State)Checked October 2 | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | Don Wagner (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | Don Wagner (source for Secretary of State)Checked October 8 | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | Don Wagner (source for Secretary of State) | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State)Checked October 7 | Don Wagner (source for Secretary of State)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed | Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Controller Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Controller | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller)Checked October 5 | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | Malia Cohen (source for Controller)Checked October 2 | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | Herb Morgan (source for Controller) | Malia Cohen (source for Controller, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Herb Morgan (source for Controller)Checked October 8 | Malia Cohen (source for Controller)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed | Herb Morgan (source for Controller) | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller)Checked October 7 | Herb Morgan (source for Controller)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | Malia Cohen (source for Controller)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | No endorsement (source for Controller) | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed | Herb Morgan (source for Controller) | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed | Malia Cohen (source for Controller) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Treasurer Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) Eleni Kounalakis · 19 groups Eleni Kounilakis · 1 group Jennifer Hawks · 4 groups No endorsement · 2 groups One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Treasurer | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Eleni Kounilakis (source for Treasurer)Checked October 5 | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer)Checked October 2 | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | Jennifer Hawks (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | Jennifer Hawks (source for Treasurer)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | No endorsement (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer)Checked October 7 | Jennifer Hawks (source for Treasurer)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | No endorsement (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | Jennifer Hawks (source for Treasurer) | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed | Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Attorney General Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Attorney General | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General)Checked October 5 | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General)Checked October 2 | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | Michael Gates (source for Attorney General) | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Michael Gates (source for Attorney General)Checked October 8 | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed | Michael Gates (source for Attorney General) | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General)Checked October 7 | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General)Checked October 7 | Michael Gates (source for Attorney General)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | No endorsement (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | Michael Gates (source for Attorney General) | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed | Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Insurance Commissioner Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) No recommendation · 1 group One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Insurance Commissioner | –Not listed | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner)Checked October 5 | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner)Checked October 2 | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | No recommendation (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed | Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) | –Not listed |
|---|
Board of Equalization, District 2One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Board of Equalization, District 2 | John Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2)Checked October 5 | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2)Checked October 2 | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | John Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | John Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | –Not listed | John Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | John Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed | Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Superintendent of Public Instruction Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) Richard Barrera · 21 groups One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Superintendent of Public Instruction | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction)Checked October 5 | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction)Checked October 2 | –Not listed | Sonja Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | Sonja Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | Sonja Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction)Checked October 7 | Sonia Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | No endorsement (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | Sonja Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) | –Not listed |
|---|
State Assembly, District 19Catherine Stefani · 17 groups No endorsement · 2 groups Philip Louis Wing · 1 group One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in State Assembly, District 19 | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19)Checked October 2 | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | Philip Louis Wing (source for State Assembly, District 19) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | No endorsement (source for State Assembly, District 19) | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19)Checked October 7 | Philip Wing (source for State Assembly, District 19)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19)Checked October 11 | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | –Not listed | No endorsement (source for State Assembly, District 19) | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | Philip Wing (source for State Assembly, District 19) | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19) | –Not listed | –Not listed | Catherine Stefani (source for State Assembly, District 19)Checked October 6 |
|---|
| Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 29 groups say Yes. 3 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗– ✓ 29 Yes✗ 3 No– 1 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds)Checked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds)Checked October 2 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Neutral (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 25 groups say Yes. 4 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗–– ✓ 25 Yes✗ 4 No– 2 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund | –Not listed | –Neutral (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund)Checked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund)Checked October 2 | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –No position (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 33 groups say Yes. 3 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗ ✓ 33 Yes✗ 3 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care)Checked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care)Checked October 2 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✗No (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care)Checked October 11 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 30 groups say Yes. 5 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗ ✓ 30 Yes✗ 5 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns)Checked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns)Checked October 2 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✗No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns)Checked October 11 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 29 groups say Yes. 4 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗ ✓ 29 Yes✗ 4 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers)Checked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers)Checked October 2 | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 19 groups say Yes. 6 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗✗–––––– ✓ 19 Yes✗ 6 No– 6 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program)Checked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | –Neutral (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program)Checked October 2 | –Not listed | –Neutral (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –No position (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Vote your values (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –No position (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | ✗No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed | –No recommendation (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 10 groups say Yes. 15 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗– ✓ 10 Yes✗ 15 No– 1 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds)Checked October 5 | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds)Checked October 2 | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –No position (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 39 – Voter ID Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 4 groups say Yes. 33 say No. ✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗ ✓ 4 Yes✗ 33 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 39 – Voter ID | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID)Checked October 5 | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID)Checked October 2 | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 40 – Billionaire tax Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 20 groups say Yes. 10 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗–––– ✓ 20 Yes✗ 10 No– 4 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 40 – Billionaire tax | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax)Checked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | –No endorsement (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax)Checked October 2 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | –Neutral (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Neutral (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax)Checked October 11 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –No recommendation (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | ✗No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 5 groups say Yes. 29 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗– ✓ 5 Yes✗ 29 No– 1 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits)Checked October 5 | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits)Checked October 2 | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Neutral (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 6 groups say Yes. 28 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗– ✓ 6 Yes✗ 28 No– 1 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings)Checked October 5 | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings)Checked October 2 | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Neutral (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 5 groups say Yes. 31 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗ ✓ 5 Yes✗ 31 No– 0 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures)Checked October 5 | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures)Checked October 2 | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 5 groups say Yes. 25 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗–– ✓ 5 Yes✗ 25 No– 2 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements)Checked October 5 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements)Checked October 2 | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –No position (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Neutral (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.comChecked October 5 | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements)Checked October 11 | ✓Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) | –Not listed |
|---|
| Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab) 5 groups say Yes. 27 say No. ✓✓✓✓✓✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗– ✓ 5 Yes✗ 27 No– 1 No position Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes)Checked October 5 | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes)Checked October 2 | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✓Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes, on sfendorsements.com)Via sfendorsements.com | ✓Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes)Checked October 8 | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | ✓Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes)Checked October 7 | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes)Checked October 11 | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –No recommendation (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed | ✗No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) | –Not listed |
|---|
Supreme Court retention (Groban, Evans)One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Supreme Court retention (Groban, Evans) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Retain both (source for Supreme Court retention (Groban, Evans)) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Retain both (source for Supreme Court retention (Groban, Evans)) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|
Court of Appeal, 1st District retentionOne square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each. Filtered: 60 of 60 endorsers Report an error in Court of Appeal, 1st District retention | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Retain all (source for Court of Appeal, 1st District retention) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | Retain all (source for Court of Appeal, 1st District retention) | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed | –Not listed |
|---|